Robyn O’Neil

Learning a bit of art from one of my favorite artists…Robyn O’Neil.

I came across her through a publication that featured her from the magazine The Believer and was blow away by the magnitude of her work and her crazy work ethic.

In some ways, performance (or drama) has great overlap with other kinds of visual art.

Using this video, try the following exercise:

Visualize your play through Robyn O’Neil’s lesson. Visualize. Visualize! Visualize!!!

What is your play going to look like on stage?

‘The Other Woman’: When Terrible Movies Happen To Funny Actresses

For full article, click here.

It is the most grotesque pantomime of girl power, these beautiful women clinking glasses and ultimately trading what must be the weakest and least earned high-five in cinema history after executing a plot made possible by one of their daddies and done with considerably more panache in the painfully generic but at least mildly agreeable 1987 Michael J. Fox film The Secret of My Success.

Honestly, I saw this movie and while I have never been a huge fan of Cameron Diaz, I have always been partially attracted to a number of her movies. No, it’s not the bisexual side talking. I just can’t help but enjoy a good girl power movie from time to time (Charlie’s Angels, anyone?). I wouldn’t say they are released sparingly each year, but a good female empowerment movie is hard to come by. Heck, I even settle for the standard, predictable plot of: woman + conflict (including no man), woman finds creative way to solve conflict using her woman powers, woman conquers world and man when there is nothing good on TV! But it’s always nice to find that gem that breaks some sort of rule or boundary or plot formula. Or, that by virtue of writers and directors that recognize women as human (gasp), we get full-fledged characters that happen to be women.

Thinking specifically of The Other Woman, I admit that I was primarily interested in watching it for a second reason. That is, the younger-older sister teen movie John Tucker Must Die. That movie. Let me tell you about that wonderful, freaking movie. It’s hilarious. It’s edgy as teen movies get without breaking the boundaries of “What would a real teenager do?” because, let’s face it, we don’t have tons of money or brains as teenagers, but we do possibly have our mom’s estrogen pills to pilfer. The soundtrack is appropriate and the script matches the timelessness of, I think, Sixteen Candles or The Breakfast Club. Maybe it’s not perfect, and it doesn’t seem to pass the Bechdel Test either.

Nonetheless, it’s clear that a good movie doesn’t need that seal of approval in order to be considered good in some way. And, I actually happen to disagree slightly with the criticism appointed to it.

The entire movie is about John Tucker – nearly every conversation relates back to him. If not, they relate to Kate’s mother’s boyfriends.

Is the movie really about him? Or is there some hardcore Chekhov’s gun principle to that 2006 film which, though in the surface seems to revolve around John, it is NOT really a movie about him. I would really like to watch it again and return to this article for an update. I saw it a few months ago and my memory is hazy, but I think that there are conversations (and character development) in that movie that aren’t about John Tucker. Sure, that everything needs to return to him is a given. The title gives the movie away. However, though we circle back to the main plot (read: man) after talks on femininity, ambitions and self-empowerment, I think it’s a movie that presents some things and someones that are rounded, interesting and subversive enough to make the film a fun and different movie-watching experience.

(Though will either movie stand against stronger films like Bridesmaids? Who knows.)

If systems of p…

If systems of policing, the police, are everywhere, then the point is to make our own work, our practices, as free from such policing as possible, not because unrestrained thought or action is always right (quite the contrary) but because, under scrupulous policing, nothing new can be produced, except perhaps evasions.

Elizabeth Grosz, Space, Time, and Perversion

The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and the Future of the Chicano/Mexicano People

Siglo de Lucha

February 5th was the anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. This treaty officially ended what has been known as the Mexican War, and which subsequently ceded over half the territory of the nation of Mexico over to the United States. Many also see it as the beginning of the Chicano people, a colonized nation within U.S. borders. Even though it happened over 166 years ago, its legacy remains today, and the aftermath will have repercussions for the future of the United States and the Chicano and Mexicano people.

This year in 2014 on that date, The Economist, a weekly British mainstream news magazine, posted a blurb about this date, along with a demographic map:

mexicomap

On February 2nd 1848, following a short and one-sided war, Mexico agreed to cede more than half its territory to the United States. An area covering most of present-day…

View original post 1,835 more words

Because writing…

Because writing is like putting your head underwater. It takes a great effort to go under, to push yourself to the sea bottom, a tremendous courage to withstand the pressure and pain and stay down there. Then the bobbing to the surface when a lifeline tugs you back.

Sandra Cisneros (“Introduction to the Third Edition” Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza by Gloria Anzaldua)

We should all be feminists – Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

Talented writer and amazing human being, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie speaks about gender, feminism and how the world dictates gender norms unto people in a way that is detrimental to humanity with a honesty and humor that is unique to her.